At the end of Ernest Hemingway's "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber," Wilson accuses Margot of killing her husband on purpose. Do you agree or disagree with WIlson?

I think it's pretty safe to say she shot her husband on purpose. Once they become aware that the first buffalo had gotten up and gone into the bush, they know that they need to go in after him. This time Macomber is not afraid. They give the animal some time to get stiff and lose energy before following the trail of blood into the trees. The initial mistaken impression that the animal was dead knocks the men off their guard and as the animal charges them with its horns flailing, they shoot wildly. Macomber stands strong and shoots well, facing the buffalo head on. Wilson takes a side angle and brings the bull down just before it gores Macomber. However, at that moment, Mrs. Macomber also shoots. It is unclear whether she was trying to shoot the buffalo that was apparently about to shred her husband, or whether she took that opportunity for a clever accident to end their marriage in good standing and inherit his wealth. Wilson is keenly aware of every angle of the situation and is not gentle with her. He does not threaten her with the legality of his death, but rather lists the practical things that need to be addressed. He says, "Why didn't you poison him? That's what they do in England" (page 37). Wilson's statement not only indicates to Mrs. Macomber that he understands the complexity of the situation and the variety of motives at her disposal, but also criticizes her bad American form. He does not stop until she finally speaks politely to him.