What is the author's tone in the biography, Alexander Hamilton, Revolutionary?

The tone of the biography, while lighthearted at times, is not afraid to criticize famous historical figures. Men like Washington, Jefferson, and Madison are not immune to scrutiny. Every accusation against Alexander is met with a rebuttal by the author proving where the accuser was incorrect. However, despite clearly rooting for Alexander, the author does not shy away from criticizing him as well. At times, the author almost sounds like a disappointed parent watching their child (Alexander) make easily avoidable mistakes. In one instance, when Congress enacted a law that allowed the government to deport any immigrants they considered a danger, the author says, “Alexander - an immigrant himself, who should have known better - favored them nonetheless” (280). The author knows that Alexander was not infallible, and wants the reader to trust that they are being given all the facts. The author is focusing on historical accuracy in order to paint a full picture of Alexander’s life when people frequently “misrepresented much of what he did and believed” (IX). Overall, the author’s tone is a critical one, focusing on the facts, refuting the rumors, and focused on revealing the truth of Alexander’s life - even the most difficult parts. Yet, they are also supportive of Alexander, and makes certain to praise the successes he made all throughout his life.