Rawls puts forth his argument in the narrative voice of both the first person singularmeaning that he uses the pronoun "I" to indicate the source of his ideasand the first person pluralmeaning that he also uses the pronoun "we" to express his ideas. This choice may be contrasted with an approach that assumes an objective, or third-person voice by which to put forth a philosophical argument. Rawls appropriately chooses the first person singular narrative voice, which allows him to articulate his ideas in the style of an individual working out a complex, admittedly imperfect, sometimes provisional, philosophyrather than the definitive, objective conclusions of a third person omniscient (all-knowing) narrator. Although Rawls argues in philosophical abstractions, his use of the first person "I" is a means of presenting his ideas as the result of an ongoing thought process.